The Court found that the petitioner had complied with the impugned order dated 01.05.2018 via evidence submitted. No cause for contempt jurisdiction was made out.
The contempt case is closed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE M.GANGA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.1685 of 2018
ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
This contempt case was instituted alleging wilful disobedience to the order dated 01.05.2018 passed by this Court in I.A.No.1 of 2018 in W.P.No.4994 of 2014.
While so, Ms.J.Sunitha, learned counsel representing Mr.D.Ramakrishna, learned counsel for the petitioner, would inform this Court that the aforestated order dated 01.05.2018 passed by this Court has been duly complied with. A copy of the proceedings dated 16.10.2018 issued by the Commissioner, Endowments Department, Andhra Pradesh, is placed on record in evidence thereof.
In the light of this development, no cause is made out for exercise of contempt jurisdiction.
The contempt case is accordingly closed. No order as to costs.
____________________ SANJAY KUMAR,J
________________ M. GANGA RAO, J
Date: 25.10.2018 IBL
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the contempt case warrants continuation given compliance with the impugned order.
Mr. D. Ramakrishna
State of Andhra Pradesh and/or Others
SANJAY KUMAR
M. GANGA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
