Petitioner agrieved over non-appointment to the post of Examiner. The High Court, upon being informed that the entire selection process was cancelled by the 1st respondent, dismissed the writ petition as no individual relief could be granted.
The Writ Petition was dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
WRIT PETITION No. 9935 of 2017
ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
Aggrieved by his non-appointment to the post of Examiner, pursuant to a recruitment undertaken by the 1st respondent, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
______________ J. UMA DEVI, J.
21st March, 2017 cbs
VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 9935 of 2017
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
Writ Petition No. 9935 of 2017
(dismissed)
21st March, 2017
cbs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the writ petition seeking appointment to a specific post can be granted relief when the entire selection process has been cancelled.
Petitioner
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
J. UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
