The petitioners challenged their non-appointment to a post after a recruitment process. The High Court dismissed the writ petition because the recruitment process was cancelled, leaving no individual relief to be granted.
No individual relief was possible due to the cancellation of the selection process; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
WRIT PETITION No. 9924 of 2017
ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
Aggrieved by their non-appointment to the post of Field Assistant, pursuant to a recruitment undertaken by the 1st respondent, the petitioners have come up with the above writ petition.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
______________ J. UMA DEVI, J.
21st March, 2017 cbs
VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No. 9924 of 2017
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
Writ Petition No. 9924 of 2017
(dismissed)
21st March, 2017
cbs
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioners can be granted individual relief when the entire recruitment process has been cancelled.
Petitioners
1st Respondent
2nd Respondent
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
J. UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
