Allowed

Ch. P. Avadhanulu, S/o. Late Appaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Telangana HC24 Jan 2017WP/9682/2013

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Court set aside disciplinary proceedings initiated against a government employee based on a conviction under IPC Section 307. After converting the conviction to IPC Section 337, the Court remitted the matter to the disciplinary authority for fresh consideration and addressed pending salary recovery.

What did the court decide?

Proceedings dated 14.09.1998 set aside and remitted to the Regional Joint Director of Higher Education for fresh consideration. Salary recovery proceedings dated 20.04.2007 also to be reviewed.

Ch. P. Avadhanulu, S/o. Late Appaiah, Vs The State… — Service and Employment | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE N. BALAYOGI

¶2

WRI T PETI TI ON No.9682 of 2013

¶3

ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)

¶4

The petitioner is the applicant in O.A.No.9396 of 2010 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad, which was dismissed vide order dated 06.03.2013. Challenge before the Tribunal was to the dismissal of the petitioner from service under proceedings dated 14.09.1998 of the Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Andhra Pradesh, Guntur, basing on his conviction under Section 307 I.P.C in S.C.No.330 of 1997 on the file of the learned Assistant Sessions Judge, Addanki. The State also issued proceedings dated 20.04.2007 ordering recovery of Rs.3,58,818/- paid to the petitioner treating the period of suspension and the period from the date of dismissal till the date of superannuation as on duty.

¶5

By order dated 02.04.2013 passed in this writ petition, this Court directed that no recovery should be effected from the petitioner pending further orders.

¶6

Sri T. Suryakaran Reddy, learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner would state that the conviction suffered by the petitioner under Section 307 I.P.C was thereafter converted to conviction under Section 337 I.P.C by this Court under order dated 08.07.2010 passed in Criminal Revision Case No.598 of 2004. Learned senior counsel would contend that in the light of the reduced conviction visited upon the petitioner, the State would necessarily have to reconsider the case and take an appropriate decision in the matter.

¶7

¶8

We find merit in this contention as the earlier proceedings dated 14.09.1998 passed by the Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Andhra Pradesh, Guntur, was based on the conviction under Section 307 I.P.C which no longer remains in the light of the order passed by this Court in Criminal Revision Case No.598 of 2004.

¶9

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of setting aside the proceedings dated 14.09.1998 of the Regional Joint Director of Higher Education, Andhra Pradesh, Guntur, and remitting the matter to the said authority for consideration afresh of the entire issue in the light of the reduced conviction of the petitioner under Section 337 I.P.C. The authority shall also look into the issue of the recovery under the proceedings dated 20.04.2007 and take an appropriate decision. This entire exercise shall be completed expeditiously and in any event, not later than 10 weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶10

Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed in the light of this final order. No order as to costs.

¶11

______________________ N. BALAYOGI , J

¶12

Date: 24.01.2017 va

Ch. P. Avadhanulu, S/o. Late Appaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ch. P. Avadhanulu, S/o. Late Appaiah, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

A Sudershan Reddy (Died). Vs Y.P. Ojha

Prem Bahadur, Vs The Govt. of A.P.

P. Rajeshwar Vs The State Tclangana

B Sumanth Reddy S/o.Srinivas Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

N.Ramlal Singh, Vs The State of Telangana

S. Mallika, Vs The State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary