Writ petition dismissed for non-prosecution as petitioners had no representation; also declared infructuous and not maintainable. No order as to costs.
Writ Petition dismissed for non-prosecution; pending miscellaneous petitions also dismissed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE N. BALAYOGI
WRI T PETI TI ON No.16882 of 2016
ORDER: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice Sanjay Kumar)
There is no representation for the petitioners or their learned counsel.
Learned Government Pleader for Services (TG) would point out that the writ petition has become infructuous in terms of the prayer. He would also state that the writ petition is not maintainable as it was not open to the petitioners to approach this Court in the first instance at the time this writ petition was filed.
In any event, as there is no representation for the petitioners or their learned counsel, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
______________________ SANJAY KUMAR, J
Date: 24.01.2017 va
Petitioners
Government Pleader for Services (TG)
Sanjay Kumar
N. Balayogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
