In WP No. 7898 of 2017, the High Court allowed the writ petition challenging the refusal of a stay on luxury tax recovery. The court granted an interim stay on the balance amount pending the appeal.
Interim stay of recovery of the balance amount till the disposal of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
Writ Petition No.7898 of 2017
Order:
Aggrieved by an order of the Additional Commissioner (CT) refusing to grant stay during the pendency of a statutory appeal under the Andhra Pradesh Tax on Luxuries Act, 1987, the petitioner has come up with the above writ petition.
___________________________ V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
________________ J.UMA DEVI, J.
07th March, 2017. Ak
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
Writ Petition No.7898 of 2017
07th March, 2017. (Ak)
1 issue framed by the court
Whether a stay of recovery is warranted when 50% of the luxury tax demand is paid pending a statutory appeal.
Petitioner
Respondent
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
