The writ petition challenging the non-release of pension and retirement benefits was disposed of as infructuous because the respondents had complied with the Tribunal order following notice issued by the Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.6254 of 2017
02.08.2017
Between:
B.Shashidar Nath
..Petitioner
and
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board (H.M.W.S.S.B.), represented by its Managing Director, Khairatabad, Hyderabad and others
..Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.S.Jagadish
Counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 3: Mr.T.Sudhakar Reddy standing counsel for H.M.W.S.S.B.
Counsel for respondent Nos.4 & 5: Government Pleader for Services-I (TS)
The Court made the following:
2
CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.6254 of 2017 02.08.2017
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This writ petition is filed for a mandamus to declare the action of the respondents in not releasing the full pension, gratuity and other retiral benefits to the petitioner in terms of order, dated 16.08.2016, in O.A.No.1803 of 2016 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’) as illegal and arbitrary.
C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
_________________________________ GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J
02nd August, 2017 GHN
B.Shashidar Nath
The Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage Board
C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy
Gudi Seva Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
