Dismissed

G. Kameshwara Rao, v. The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC2 Aug 2017WP/15455/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Writ Petition challenged the respondents' inaction in implementing a Tribunal order regarding pension penalties. The Court noted that a later Government Order remedied the grievance, disposing of the petition as infructuous.

What did the court decide?

The Writ Petition and the related miscellaneous petition were disposed of as infructuous.

G. Kameshwara Rao, Vs The State of… — Pension and Retirement Benefits | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD

¶2

WRIT PETITION No.15455 of 2017

¶3

Date:02.8.2017

¶4

Between : G.Kameshwara Rao, S/o Venkateswarlu ..... Petitioner And: The State of Telangana, reptd by its Principal Secretary, Agl. & Co-Operation (Vig.Cell) Department, Hyderabad and another. .....Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Mr. S.Satyanarayana Rao

¶5

Counsel for the respondents:GP for Agriculture & Co-Operation(TS)

¶6

The Court made the following:

¶7

CVNR, J & GSP, J WP.No.15455 of 2017 Dated:02.8.2017

¶8

¶9

ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)

¶10

This Writ Petition is filed for a Mandamus to declare the inaction of the respondents in implementing order, dated 07.8.2015, in Original Application No.588 of 2013 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal at Hyderabad, as illegal and arbitrary.

¶11

By order, dated 22.6.2017, this Court while adjourning the case to today, directed the respondents to be personally present, if they do not implement the above-mentioned order of the Tribunal.

¶12

Today, at the hearing, the learned Government Pleader for Agriculture & Co-Operation (Telangana State) has placed before the Court G.O.Rt.No.436, Agriculture and Co-Operation (Vig.) Department, dated 26.7.2017, wherein respondent No.1 has substituted the penalty of reversion and also 10% cut in pension with the penalty of only 10% cut in pension payable to the petitioner.

¶13

Mr. S.Satyanarayana Rao, the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that by issuing the afore-mentioned G.O., the respondents have complied with the said order of the Tribunal and that, therefore, the grievance with which his client has filed this Writ Petition has ceased.

¶14

CVNR, J & GSP, J WP.No.15455 of 2017 Dated:02.8.2017

¶15

¶16

In the light of the above, the Writ Petition is disposed of as

¶17

infructuous.

¶18

As a sequel to disposal of the Writ Petition, WPMP.No.19070 of 2017 filed by the petitioner for interim relief is disposed of as infructuous.

¶19

_____________________________ JUSTICE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY

¶20

________________________
JUSTICE G.SHYAM PRASAD
02 nd August 2017
DR

G. Kameshwara Rao, v. The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

G. Kameshwara Rao, v. The State of Telangana rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

K.V.S. Sivudu, Vs The Labour Court, Guntur, Rep. by its Presiding Officer.

Singareni Collieries Co. Ltd., Vs The Chairman, Industrial Tribunal -cum-Labour Court-

K.Shishna, Vs District Educational Officer

B.Shashidar Nath, Vs The Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply and Sewerage

M.Gangaram Vs The State of Telangana, rep. by its Principal Secretary

J. v. Prasad, Vs The State of Telangana