A single-paragraph order dismissing a writ petition as infructuous due to a reported settlement outside the court.
The writ petition was dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions were closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
WRIT PETITION No.6248 OF 2004
ORDER:
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in spite of his best efforts, the petitioner is not in touch with him. However, he learnt that the matter was settled outside the Court.
In view of the settlement of the matter outside the Court, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. If the learned counsel for the petitioner gets in touch with the petitioner and knows that the matter was not settled outside the Court, it is open to him to approach this Court within thirty (30) days from today.
The writ petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Consequently, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________________
A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO, J
17.07.2017
pln
Petitioner
Respondent
A. Ramalingeswara Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
