This court closed a contempt case filed concerning non-implementation of a prior order in a writ petition, noting that the respondents had produced an order rejecting the petitioners' representation.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO
CONTEMPT CASE No.993 OF 2017
ORDER :
This contempt case is filed alleging non-implementation of the order in W.P.M.P.No.35650 of 2016 in W.P.No.28788 of 2016, dated 31.08.2016, wherein this Court directed the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioners, dated 12.02.2015, and pass appropriate orders within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of that order.
Learned counsel for the respondents produced before this Court an order, dated 18.05.2017, considering the representation and rejecting the same.
In view of the same, no further proceedings are required in the present contempt case. However, it is open to the petitioners to raise the other contentions in the pending writ petition.
The contempt case is accordingly closed
__________________________ A.RAMALINGESWARA RAO , J 14.07.2017 pln
Petitioners
Respondents
A. RAMALINGESWARA RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
