M/s.Shri Shagun Mithai Vatika, Vs The State of Telangana

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN

¶2

AND

¶3

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶4

WRIT PETITION No. 6119 of 2017

¶5

ORDER: (Per VRS,J)

¶6

Aggrieved by the rejection of the stay petition by the Joint Commissioner, during the pendency of a regular appeal before the Value Added Tax Appellate Tribunal, the dealer under the Telangana Value Added Tax Act has come up with the present writ petition.

¶7

Heard Mr. B. Srinivas, learned counsel for the petitioner.

¶8

Mr. T. Vinod Kumar, learned special standing counsel for

¶9

Commercial Taxes (Telangana), takes notice for the respondents.

¶10

The petitioner has already paid 25% of the tax as a pre-condition for the appellate authority to entertain the appeal. Therefore, following the similar orders passed by this Court, we dispose of the Writ Petition, granting an interim stay in favour of the petitioner, pending disposal of the regular appeal, subject to the condition that apart from the 25% of the tax, which the petitioner has already paid, the petitioner shall pay another 25% of the tax, within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶11

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No.6119 of 2017

¶12

2

¶13

Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the

¶14

writ petition shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.

¶15

__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J

¶16

______________ J. UMA DEVI, J. 23^rd February, 2017 cbs

¶17

VRS,J & JUD,,J WP No.6119 of 2017

¶18

3

¶19

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN  AND

¶20

THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI

¶21

Writ Petition No. 6119 of 2017

¶22

(disposed of)

¶23

23^rd February, 2017

¶24

cbs

M/s.Shri Shagun Mithai Vatika, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

M/s.Shri Shagun Mithai Vatika, v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

The Principal Commssioner of Income Tax-1 Vs M/s. Jaya Constructions

M/s.Sushee Hitech Projects (P) Ltd, Vs Commercial Tax Officer, Jubilee Hills Circle, Hyderabad.

Smt.Eniganti Padma, Vs The District Collector (P.R) Wing

N.Ismail Vs Government of Andhra Pradesh

M/s. Obulapurarn Mining Co. Pvt., Ltd., Vs The Deputy Commissioner (Ct)

The Prl. Commissioner Income-tax [Exemptions] Vs Sciet Educational Society