The appeal was dismissed as withdrawn because its tax effect fell below the ceiling limit in Circular No.21/2015. Questions of law remain unanswered; miscellaneous petitions are closed.
The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn; questions of law are left unanswered; miscellaneous petitions are closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A.No.81 of 2017
Judgment:
Since the tax effect of the appeal is less than the ceiling limit prescribed under Circular No.21/2015, dated 10-12-2015, the case is not covered by the exceptions under paras-5 and 8 of the said Circular. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the questions of law are left unanswered. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs.
___________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
J.UMA DEVI, J.
27 th February, 2017.
Ak
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
I.T.T.A.No.81 of 2017
27th February, 2017. (Ak)
1 provisions across 1 enactments
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN
J.UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
