The writ petitions challenging the stay granted on tax collection were closed and dismissed because the original order of assessment had been set aside on regular appeal in a subsequent order. No further hearing or orders were necessary.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
WRIT PETITION Nos. 44672 and 44681 of 2016
COMMON ORDER: (Per VRS,J)
Both these writ petitions arise out of the orders passed by the Additional Commissioner (Commercial Taxes), granting a stay of the collection of the disputed tax, upon payment of 50% of the disputed tax.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
writ petitions shall stand dismissed. No order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
3rd February, 2017 cbs
VRS,J & JUD,,J WP Nos.44672 & 44681 of 2016
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
Writ Petition Nos. 44672 & 44681 of 2016
(closed)
3rd February, 2017
cbs
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
