The High Court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous upon the counsel's representation. No substantive legal reasoning was provided in this order.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR AND THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE N.BALAYOGI
WRI T PETI TI ON No.44519 of 2016
ORDER : (per SK,J)
Sri Harinath Reddy Somagutta, learned counsel representing Sri N.Chandra Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner, states
that the matter has become infructuous.
Recording the said statement, the writ petition is dismissed.
Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand dismissed.
No order as to costs.
__
JUSTI CE SANJAY KUMAR
JUSTI CE N.BALAYOGI
Date:18.01.2017
GJ
N. Chandra Sekhar Reddy
State of Telangana/Respondent
Sanjay Kumar
N. Balayogi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
