Dismissed
A. Rama Rao v. Union of India, Rep by its Secretary, Department of Pension
Telangana HCWP/7859/2011
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Rao, S/o. A.E R/o. Hyderabad. 2. G.V.…
What the court decided
AI extract
Rao, S/o. A.E R/o. Hyderabad. 2. G.V.…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
125241
HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD (Special Original Jurisdiction)
THURSDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY TWO
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI /. AND THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO .,/
|.A.NOS.1 AND 3 0F 2015
IN/AND WRIT PETITION NO: 7859 OF 20{1
Between
...PETITIONERS
AND
...RESPONDENTS
Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of lndiapraying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may bepleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or directions in the nature of Writ by declaring the OMs F..No.38/37/08-PX PW(A) dated 03.10.2008 and 11.02.2009 issued by respondents 1 and 2 as illegal, arbitrary and unconstitutional and set aside the same along with the order dated 03.09.20'10 of C.A.T. Hyderabad in O.A.No.400/2009 with directions to the respondents to refix the pension of thepetitioners at Rs.39,5001 onpar with that admissible to HAG Officers who have retired or will retire after 01.01.2006 after completion of 33 years of service, with all consequential benefits such as payment of arrears, etc. with interest @ 12% per annum
l.A. NO: 1 OF 201S(WPMP. NO: 51414 OF 2015)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of thepetition, the High Court may be pleased to condone the delay of(21 ) Days in filing petition against the order dated 10-8-2015, in W.P.No.7859 of 20l 1 dismissing the same for default and non prosecution and to restore the same for hearing on merits.
l.A. NO: 1 OF 2011(WPIUP. NO: 9?6 OE2911)
Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the operations of the order dated 03.09.2010 of the C.A.T. Hyderabad in O.A.No.400 of 2009 in the interest ofjustice, pending disposal of the writ petition
Counsel for the Petitioners : SRl. VEMURI VENKATESWARA RAO(NOT PRESENT)
Counsel for the Respondents: NONE APPEARED
The Court made the following: ORDER
HON'BLE SRIJUSTICE ABHINAND KUMAR SHAVILI AND
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO
I.A.Nos.l and 3 of 2015 Inland W.P.No.7859 OF 2011
ORDER: (Per I{o n'ble SriJustice Abhinand Kumar Shauili)
tWhen the matter is talen up for hearing, it is
noticed that the writ petition was earlier dismissed for non-prosecution on 10-08-2015. Thereafter, the petitioners have filed I.ANo.1 of 2015 seeking to condone the delay of 2l days rn filing the restoration application in I.ANo.3 of ZOLS.
Furher, when the rurtter was listed oL03.11.2022,
none appeared and there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed under the caption "for dis6ls5xl". Today also, u,4ren the matter is taken up for hearing, none appears and there is no representation on behalf of the
)
petitioners. It appears that the petltloners are not interested in prosecuting the matrer
For the reasons stated in the affidavit filed in suppoft of the application, I.ANo .l of 2015 is dismissed, consequentl)'LANo.3 of 2015 is also dismissed.
Accordingly, the main writ petition is also dismissed for non-prosecution. No costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, 1f any, pending shall stand
closed.
t-
SD/. K.SREERAMA MURTHY ASSISTAN]t-REGISTRAR //IRUE COPY// clt SECTION OFFIGER
To,
SB\
*/--
HIGH COURT
DATED:1711112022
t
ORDER
l.A.NO's1&3of 2015
IN/AND - : 1)-)*< -() 7dil of ffi8 1ry.p.116.@il
1 E STAI$
(
o).Jq I g ttB 1[?n
*
BOTH l.A.NO's 1 & 3 ot 2015 AREDISMISSED
AND
DISMISSING OF THE WRIT PETITION FOR
NON PROSECUTION WITHOUT COSTS
\3
A. Rama Rao
G.V. Subrahmanyam
D. Jagannadham
P.V. Bhaskara Rao
S.H.R. Krishna Rao
S.A.V. Sastry
Abhinand Kumar Shavili
Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court