Allowed

Rhythm College of Para-Medical Sciences, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Telangana HC5 Oct 2017WP/34490/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This Writ Petition filed to declare the withdrawal of the petitioner's recognition certificate as illegal was allowed. The order declares the withdrawal order dated 16.08.2016 set aside based on a prior batch judgment granting approval to para medical institutions by the Para Medical Board.

What did the court decide?

Withdrawal of recognition order dated 16.08.2016 set aside; respondents instructed to issue notification for admissions within 15 days.

Rhythm College of Para-Medical Sciences, Vs The… — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 34490 OF 2016

¶2

O R D E R :

¶3

This Writ Petition is filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the 2^nd respondent in issuing the order dated 16.08.2016 withdrawing the recognition certificate of the petitioner institution as illegal and arbitrary.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Chittem Venkata Reddy as well as learned Advocate General on behalf of the respondents.

¶5

Today, this Court, in Writ Petition No. 16610 of 2016 and batch of cases, has dealt with, in detail, the question ‘whether granting of permission by the Para Medical Board for establishing the institutions for offering para-medical courses without there being sanction/permission /essentiality certificate from the government under Section 20 of the A.P. Education Act, 1982, is legal and valid and answered the same in affirmative. It has been held therein that the Para Medical Board is competent in all respects to grant approval for establishment of institutions and also authorize offering of new courses. A direction was also issued to the respondents to allow the petitioner institutions for the purpose of admission of students into para medical courses and allow them to offer the courses, which, ultimately, lead to grant of approved certificates. Consequently, the proceedings of the 2^nd respondent dated 16.08.2016 has been set aside.

¶6

It has been further observed that, considering the fact that on account of pendency of the Writ Petitions, some of the eligible institutions could not make admissions for the academic year

¶7

¶8

2017-18 and considering the fact that, no interim orders were passed, in fairness, the said institutions shall be given an opportunity to make admissions, for which purpose, the respondents shall consider issuing notification in terms of the Rules and such exercise shall be completed within 15 days from today. It is clarified that the respondents shall be at liberty to take action with respect to the institutions, which have not complied with the formalities like obtaining registration/permissions, as required in terms of Sections 17 and 24, as may be applicable. .

¶9

In the facts and circumstances of the present case and in view of the order passed in the above Writ Petition, this Writ Petition is also allowed, in terms thereof. No costs.

¶10

Consequently, the miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand closed. ____________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J 05^th October 2017 ksld

Rhythm College of Para-Medical Sciences, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rhythm College of Para-Medical Sciences, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Thirumala Cabs, Vs B. Sampath Kumar

Ahmed College of Education, Vs State of Telangana

M/s. Nizams Chemist and Druggist, Bhavanagar Ward Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Kareema Thobani Vs The Regional Passport Officer

Victoria Para-Medical Institute, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Sri Srinivasa Technical Educational Society Vs The State of Telangana