Disposed

Ahmed College of Education, v. State of Telangana

Telangana HC4 Oct 2017WP/33186/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court disposed of a writ petition challenging the State of Telangana's refusal to grant affiliation and permission for a B.Ed. course. Relying on the judgment in Writ Petition No. 26870 of 2016, the court directed the State to consider the petitioner's case in accordance with that order for the 2017-18 academic year within a week, noting that permission had already been granted in earlier simi

What did the court decide?

Direction to the 1st respondent to consider the petitioner's case in terms of Writ Petition No. 26870 of 2016 for the academic year 2017-18 and take a decision within a week.

Ahmed College of Education, Vs State of Telangana — Education and Admissions | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE CHALLA KODANDA RAM WRIT PETITION No. 33186 OF 2017

¶2

O R D E R :

¶3

This Writ Petition has been filed seeking a mandamus to declare the action of the 1^st respondent State of Telangana in not passing an appropriate Government Order in favour of the petitioner, under Section 20 of the A.P. Education Act, 1982, pursuant to the recognition granted by the NCTE for the academic year 2016-17 and the consequential act of the 3^rd respondent Telangana University in not granting affiliation to petitioner institution and not including it in the process of counselling for allotment of students in B.Ed. course for the academic year 2017-18, as arbitrary and illegal.

¶4

Heard Smt. G. Jhansi, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A. Abhishek Reddy, learned Standing Counsel for Respondents 2 and 4, learned Government Pleader for Higher Education (Telangana) for Respondents 1 and 5 and Sri Krishna Murthy, learned Standing Counsel for the 3^rd respondent.

¶5

It is submitted at the Bar that the issue raised in the present Writ Petition is squarely covered by the judgment dated 16.09.2016 of this Court in Writ Petition No. 26870 of 2016 and batch. It is also brought to the notice of this Court that the said Order of the learned Single Judge was confirmed in Writ Appeal No. 1047 of 2016 and further, the Special Leave Petition filed thereagainst also came to be dismissed by the Supreme Court.

¶6

¶7

Thereafter, in case of the writ petitioners therein, the State had granted permission and issued necessary Government Orders. This aspect of the matter is not disputed by the learned counsel appearing for the parties.

¶8

In those circumstances, the Writ Petition is disposed of with a direction to the 1^st respondent to consider the case of the petitioner in terms of para 20 of the judgment of the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 26870 of 2016 and batch, dated 16.09.2016, for the academic year 2017-18, and take necessary decision within a week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

¶9

Consequently, the miscellaneous Applications, if any shall stand closed.

¶10

________________________ CHALLA KODANDA RAM, J

¶11

Dt:04.10.2017

¶12

Note: Issue cc tomorrow. (B/o) kdl

Ahmed College of Education, v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ahmed College of Education, v. State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pathan Baji, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Smt. Vadapalli Parimala, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

K. Sankar Reddy, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by The Principal Secretary

Thirumala Cabs, Vs B. Sampath Kumar

M/s. Nizams Chemist and Druggist, Bhavanagar Ward Vs State of Andhra Pradesh

Sompelly Yellaiah Vs The State of Telangana