This order, copied from W.P.No.25003 of 2017, suspended the impugned order suspending the petitioner's license pending final orders after allowing an explanation to a show cause notice.
Impugned order stands suspended; petitioner directed to submit explanation to show cause notice within one week; further action open for respondents.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI
WRIT PETITION No.30241 of 2017
ORDER :
This writ petition is filed for a writ of Mandamus declaring the order of the fourth respondent dated 24.08.2017 in Rc.No.BS/95/2017, suspending the license of the petitioner to carry on the business, by exercising powers under Section 31(1)(b) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968, as arbitrary and illegal and for a consequential direction to set aside the same.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in similar circumstances, this Court disposed of W.P.No.25003 of 2017, dated 27.07.2017, and the same is not disputed by the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise (Telangana).
In view of the same, this writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order dated 27.07.2017, passed by this Court in W.P.No.25003 of 2017, directing the petitioner to submit explanation to the show cause notice within a period of one week from today and thereafter, it is open for the respondents to take further action and pass final orders after affording opportunity to the petitioner. Till passing of final orders, the impugned order shall stand suspended.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
Date: 07.09.2017 TJMR
____________________ A.V. SESHA SAI, J
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the impugned order suspending the petitioner's license to carry on business under Section 31(1)(b) of the A.P. Excise Act, 1968 was arbitrary and illegal.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.25003 of 2017Followed¶6
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Assistant Government Pleader for Prohibition and Excise (Telangana)
A.V. SESHAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
