Dismissed
Kakarla Sivaji Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh
Telangana HCWP/30020/2017
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION…
What the court decided
AI extract
SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.V.SESHA SAI WRIT PETITION No.30020 of 2017
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and Smt. Jhansi, learned Standing counsel for the respondent Municipal Corporation.
When the matter is taken up, it is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that the issue in the present writ petition is squarely covered by the order of this Court in W.P.No.33122 of 2016, dated 29.08.2017, and a copy of the said order is also placed on record. The operative
portion of the said order reads as under;
“The issue centres round a small area. The petitioners complain that the structures at petition property shall not be disturbed, if warranted in accordance with law. After perusing the stand taken by respondents in the counter affidavit and also the notice issued by Corporation, this Court is of the view that the 2nd respondent is taking steps to negotiate that all the stake holders firstly to cooperate for road widening and inviting them for negotiations. It is for the parties to respond and if otherwise they are not inclined to accept the offers given either under G.O.Ms.No.168 or 119, the 2nd respondent is required to follow the procedure prescribed by law.”
Following the above said order and for the reasons
stated therein, this writ petition is also disposed of in terms
thereof. No order as to costs.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall also stand closed.
__________________ A.V.SESHA SAI, J
Date: 06.09.2017 ES
Note: 1. Furnish C.C. within two days.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.33122 of 2016Followed¶4
Petitioners
Municipal Corporation
A.V.SESHA SAI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court