Vennapu Sudhakara Rao Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO

¶2

WRIT PETITION Nos.28594, 28650 & 28693 OF 2017

¶3

DATED : 28.08.2017

¶4

Between :

¶5

Smt Mungamuri Nagamani W/o.Madhubabu, Hindu, Female, Age : 46 yrs, Advocate 4^th ward, D.No.2-23-3/1, Kovvur, West Godavari District.

¶6

.. Petitioner

¶7

And

¶8

The State of Andhra Pradesh, Revenue (Registration-II), Department, Secretariat, Hyderabad, Rep., by its Prl. Secretary (Special Chief Secretary) to Government & others.

¶9

.. Respondents

¶10

This court made the following :

¶11

2 -

¶12

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION Nos.28594, 28650 & 28693 OF 2017

¶13

COMMON ORDER :

¶14

Heard.

¶15

These writ petitions are filed to declare the proceedings issued by the 1^st respondent vide Memo dated 31.08.2015 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 19(1) (g) of the Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of Notaries Act and Rules and consequently to set aside the same by directing the respondents to renew the notary licence of the petitioners.

¶16

Concerning the same subject matter W.P.No.9655 of 2016 & batch was considered by the Single Judge of this Court and by common order dated 02.12.2016, set aside the memo impugned herein and issued consequential directions.

¶17

Following the said decision, these writ petitions are also allowed and respondents are directed to consider the renewal applications submitted by the petitioners, in terms of the orders passed in the above judgment, in accordance with law, without reference to the memo impugned. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶18

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these writ petitions shall stand closed.

¶19

__________________ P.NAVEEN RAO,J

¶20

28^th August, 2017 Rds

Vennapu Sudhakara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vennapu Sudhakara Rao v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pinnamaraju Usha W/o. P.V.R. Gajapathi Raju, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep by its Principal

Saha Chandra Gupta, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep. by its Prl. Secretary

A. Srinivasulu Vs Y.S. B.S. Vittal

P. Ram Reddy Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh Rep.by its Principal Secretary

Teegunta Venkataiah, S/o late Changaiah, Vs State of Andhra Pradesh, rep. by its Principal Secretary

Kalubandi Jeevamma Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh