The court closed the contempt case as the respondent agency rejected the petitioner's claim, negating wilful disobedience of the earlier order directing examination under the compassionate appointment scheme.
Contempt case closed; petitioner directed to approach the High Court for appropriate remedy.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1255 OF 2017
Date: 24.08.2017
Between :
A.Srinivasulu S/o late Govindappa, Aged about 29 years, r/o H.No.4-68/1, Pilligundla Colony, Kalyandurgam Road, Ananthapuramu district, A.P.
…. Petitioner
And
Y.S.B.S. Vittal, Managing Director, A.P.Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation (APEWIDC), (an enterprise of Government of A.P.), 4th Floor, Rajiv Vidya Mission Building, SCERT Compound, Hyderabad.
…. Respondents/ Respondent No.2 in writ petition
This Court made the following :
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1255 OF 2017
ORDER:
Writ Petition No.11616 of 2017 was disposed of by order dated 04.04.017 directing the A.P.Education and Welfare Infrastructure Development Corporation to examine claim of the petitioner for provision of employment under compassionate appointment scheme. Alleging inaction in compliance of the said direction, this contempt case is filed.
Miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
Date: 24.08.2017 kkm
3
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
CONTEMPT CASE NO.1255 OF 2017
Date: 24.08.2017
kkm
1 issue framed by the court
Whether there is wilful disobedience of a high court order directing examination of a compassionate appointment claim.
A.Srinivasulu
Y.S.B.S. Vittal
P.Naveen Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
