Petitioner challenged non-implementation of a Tribunal order. The court found the order had been implemented by respondents, disposing the petition as infructuous and also dismissing the ancillary MP. No substantive legal principle laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY
AND
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD WRI T PETI TI ON No.20235 of 2017
02.08.2017
Between:
Y.Nagaraju
..Petitioner
and
The State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Development Department, Secretariat Buildings, Hyderabad and others
..Respondents
Counsel for the petitioner: Mr.P.Raghavender Reddy
Counsel for the respondents: Government Pleader for Services-I (TS)
The Court made the following:
2
CVNR,J & GSP,J W.P.No.20235 of 2017 02.08.2017
ORDER: (Per the Hon’ble Sri Justice C.V.Nagarjuna Reddy)
This writ petition is filed with the grievance that the respondents have not been implementing order, dated 13.02.2013, in O.A.No.1104 of 2013 on the file of the Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal, Hyderabad (for short ‘the Tribunal’).
______________________________ C.V.NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
_________________________________ GUDI SEVA SHYAM PRASAD, J 02nd August, 2017 GHN
Y. Nagaraju
The State of Telangana
C.V. Nagarjuna Reddy
Gudi Seva Shyam Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
