The court held that the dispute over survey numbers concerning land possession is a question of fact for the Civil Court, not suitable for a Writ Petition. Petitioners are directed to approach the Civil Court, but status quo is maintained for six weeks.
Petitioners directed to approach the Civil Court; status quo maintained for six weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M.S.RAMACHANDRA RAO
WP.No.13874 of 2012
O R D E R :
Heard counsel for the petitioners, Sri C.Buchi Reddy, Standing counsel for respondents 1 & 4, Smt Pingali Laxmi, Standing Counsel for 3rd respondent, and the Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for 2nd respondent.
2
____________________________ M.S. RAMACHANDRA RAO, J
15th March, 2017 gra
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the disputed survey number regarding land possession can be conveniently adjudicated in a Writ Petition.
Whether the petitioners should approach the Civil Court for the declaration of title and possession.
Whether status quo should be maintained on the subject land pending civil proceedings.
Petitioners
A.P. Housing Board
Municipal Corporation of Warangal
Respondents 1
Respondents 3
Respondents 2
M.S. Ramachandra Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
