Second appeal allowed. Parties agreed to grant appellant six months to vacate premises pursuing arrears separately. Second appeal disposed of without costs with appellant agreeing not to alienate property.
Appellant granted six months time for delivery of vacant possession; case disposed without costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO
SECOND APPEAL No. 1113 of 2017
JUDGMENT:
Heard Sri V. Ramakrishna Reddy, learned counsel for appellant and Sri R. A. Achutanand, learned counsel for respondent.
to the respondent/plaintiff. It is agreed by the appellant that during his
2
UDPR,J SA No. 1113 OF 2017
stay, he will not alienate or sub-lease the suit schedule premises to the
third parties.
As a sequel there to, miscellaneous applications, pending if any,
shall stand closed.
_________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J Date: 11.10.2017 KA
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant requires reasonable time for delivery of vacant possession of the suit premises.
Whether the second appeal involves substantial questions of law.
Appellant
Respondent
U Durga Prasad Rao
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
