This judgment dismisses a Civil Revision Petition at the admission stage. The High Court held that issuing notice was not expedient in a matrimonial matter where trial court considerations necessitated a full hearing on merits rather than a default judgment.
Notice to respondent refused; Civil Revision Petition dismissed at admission stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE U.DURGA PRASAD RAO CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.5283 of 2017
ORDER:
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the matter is disposed of at the admission stage as it is not expedient to order notice on the respondent.
2
UDPR,J C.R.P.No.5283 of 2017 11.10.2017
______________________________ U.DURGA PRASAD RAO, J
11th October, 2017
GHN
1 issue framed by the court
Whether notice should be issued to the respondent in this civil revision petition given the nature of the matrimonial dispute.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Petitioner
Respondent
U DURGA PRASAD RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
