Common order dismissing two civil revision petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India as infructuous following the disposal of the underlying suit by the lower court.
Petitions dismissed as infructuous; mutually pending miscellaneous applications if any, dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.5355 AND 5356 OF 2012
COMMON ORDER :
Both the civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the orders in I.A.No.482 of 2012 in O.S.No.1206 of 2012 and I.A.No.483 of 2012 in I.A.No.411 of 2012 in O.S.No.1206 of 2012 dated 08.10.2012 passed by the VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad.
Now, it is informed by the VI Junior Civil Judge, City Civil Court, Hyderabad, that O.S.No. 1206 of 2012 was disposed of on 30.08.2014. Hence, in view of the disposal of the suit, both the civil revision petitions become infructuous.
In the result, both the civil revision petitions are dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand dismissed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date:09.06.2017 SP
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
