J. K Garments, v. Majji Rama Krishna
Case brief
What is this about?
A civil revision petition challenging an interim injunction order was dismissed as infructuous because the underlying suit had been dismissed and left unpressed in the lower court.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.3791 OF 2012
ORDER :
This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order in C.M.A.No.28 of 2010 dated 20.01.2012 passed by the Principal District Judge at Vizianagaram, filed against the order and decree in I.A.No.551 of 2010 in O.S.No.245 of 2010 dated 28.09.2010 on the file of Principal junior Civil Judge, Vizianagaram.
The petitioner filed I.A.No.551 of 2010 under Order XXXIX Rule 1 and Section 151 of C.P.C for grant of interim injunction restraining the respondents/defendants from interfering with the petitioner’s business during pendency of the suit. The Trial Court passed an interim order and the same was reversed by the Principal District Judge in C.M.A.No.28 of 2010..
Now, it is informed by the Principal Junior Civil Judge’s Court, Vizianagaram, that O.S.No. 245 of 2010 was dismissed as not pressed on 08.10.2012. Hence, in view of the dismissal of the suit, the present civil revision petition has become infructuous.
In the result, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous applications pending if any, shall also stand dismissed.
Date:09.06.2017 SP
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
The Petitioner
- respondent
The Respondents
Coram
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Telangana HC
- Decided on
- · June
- Registered
- Case no.
- CRP/3791/2012
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court