Civil Revision Petitions were dismissed for non-prosecution as no representatives appeared for the petitioners on the hearing dates.
No order as to costs; pending miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4836, 4839 and 4840 of 2013 COMMON ORDER:
When the matters were called, on 05-06-2017, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners, as such this Court directed to post the matters under the caption ‘for dismissal’. Even today, when the matters are called, none appear for the petitioners. This indicates that the petitioners herein have no interest in prosecuting the Civil Revision Petitions.
In view of the above, these Civil Revision Petitions are dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs.
The Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in these Civil Revision Petitions shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
June 08, 2017 Pn
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION Nos.4836, 4839 and 4840 of 2013
June 08, 2017
Pn
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
