The Criminal Revision Case was dismissed for default as the petitioner was absent on the date of hearing when the matter was listed for dismissal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SEETHARAMA MURTI CRIMINAL REVISION CASE No.1862 of 2012
ORDER:
As the petitioner was called absent on 02.06.2017, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For Dismissal”. Yet again the petitioner, who is appearing as a party-in-person, is absent.
2. The learned counsel for the 2nd respondent is present.
3. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed for default. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Criminal Revision
Case, shall stand closed.
___________________
M.Seetharama Murti, J
07 th June, 2017
Bvv
Petitioner
2nd Respondent
M.Seetharama Murti
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
