The High Court dismissed a writ petition challenging an ex parte attachment notice under the Chief Funds Act. The Court held the petitioner must first apply to the Deputy Registrar to vacate the order before approaching the High Court.
Civil Revision Petition dismissed; misc. petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
Civil Revision Petition No.2739 of 2017
ORDER:
Aggrieved by a notice of attachment issued under Section 68 (2) of the Chief Funds Act, 1982 (wrongly typed as under Section 88 (2) of the Act), the subscriber to a chit, who took the prize money, has come up with the above revision.
VRS, J
2
CRP.No.2739 of 2016
Therefore, with the above liberty, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed.
________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
Date: 16-06-2017
Ksn
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petitioner is entitled to challenge an ex parte attachment notice without first applying to vacate the same.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Chit subscriber who took the prize money
Deputy Registrar of Chits
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
