“17. It is required to be noted that the ultimate endeavour of the Courts should be in the direction of the upholding the majesty of the Courts and safeguarding the sanctity of the orders and decrees of the Courts from being invaded and flouted in the name of lame, feeble and unreasonable excuses and explanations and in the name of unsustainable technicalities. In the instant case, the petitioners herein, having suffered an order of injunction and having failed to assail the same, are attempting to take shelter in the guise of pendency of suit, O.S. No.88 of 2013, and in the considered view of this Court, the same is not tenable in the absence of any order in their favour. The efforts of the Courts should necessarily be in the direction of creating confidence in the people in the system and the same cannot be achieved without respect to the rule of finality. It is a settled law that unless the order under challenge suffers from jurisdictional error and patent perversity, the jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India is not available. Since the order under challenge, in the considered opinion of this Court, does not suffer either from any jurisdictional error or any perversity, this Court does not find any justification to meddle with the order impugned.
