Arunkumar Jain v. The State of Ap.,Rep.by its Publice Prosecutor
Case brief
What is this about?
Criminal petitions referred to Supreme Court Mediation Centre were disposed of based on a consent award passed on 27.3.2017.
Criminal petitions referred to Supreme Court Mediation Centre were disposed of based on a consent award passed on 27.3.2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY CRIMINAL PETITION NOS. 9148, 9426, 8947 & 8948 OF 2011
COMMON ORDER:
It is represented by learned counsel appearing for both sides that these Criminal Petitions were referred to Supreme Court Mediation Centre (under the aegis of the Supreme Court Legal Services Committee) and an award has been passed with the consent of the parties and these Criminal Petitions may be disposed of in terms of the said award.
In view of the above submission, these Criminal Petitions are disposed of in terms of the award dated 27.3.2017 passed by the Supreme Court Mediation Centre. Miscellaneous applications, pending if any, shall stand closed.
JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 20.04.2017 KA
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court