Justice M. Satyanarayana Murthy dismissed a Civil Revision Petition filed under Article 226, holding it infructuous as the underlying suit was disposed of by the trial court before this Court could grant a stay.
The Civil Revision Petition was dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON'BLE SRI JUSTI CE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CI VI L REVI SI ON PETI TI ON No.1 4 5 8 of 2 0 1 3
ORDER:
This Civil Revision Petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is filed challenging the Order Dt.06.03.2013 in I.A.No.74 of 2013 in O.S.No.94 of 2012 passed by I Additional District at Khammam, whereby the Court allowed the petition filed under Order IX Rule 7 CPC to set aside the ex parte Order dt.29.01.2013 permitting the petitioners/ defendant Nos.1 to 5 to contest the suit O.S.No.94 of 2012.
During pendency of the present revision, the suit itself was disposed of on 10.10.2014 by I Additional District Judge, Khammam, as no stay was granted by this Court. Since the purpose as sought for by the petitioners is already served, there is no need to pass further orders in this Revision.
Accordingly, this Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this case, shall stand closed.
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J Date: 29-06-2017. eha
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CRP No. 1458 of 2013
Dt. 29‐06‐2017
eha
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Civil Revision Petition can be entertained when the underlying suit has been disposed of during the pendency of the revision.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
