Deleted as infructuous. The petition challenging rejection of plaint could not lie as the suit was already disposed of by the trial court before the impugned order.
Petition dismissed as infructuous pending MCs dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
CIVIL REVISION PETITION No. 1051 OF 2013
ORDER:
This civil revision petition is filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 07-11-2012 in I.A.No. 1246 of 2010 in O.S.No. 76 of 2009 on the file of the Court of I Additional Senior Civil Judge, R.R. District at L.B. Nagar, Hyderabad (for short, 'the trial Court'), whereby the trial Court dismissed the petition filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure for rejection of plaint.
During hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that the suit itself was disposed of by the trial Court on 05-08-2015. When the suit was disposed of, question of rejecting the plaint by the trial Court does not arise. Hence, the petition has become infructuous in view of the disposal of the main suit itself.
The civil revision petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand dismissed in consequence. No costs.
M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J.
Date: 28-06-2017. JSK
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
