Criminal petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C. filed by accused Nos.1 to 3 was dismissed as infructuous after the State successfully demonstrated that cognizance was taken in the underlying C.C.No.112 of 2016.
The criminal petition dismissed as infructuous; miscellaneous petitions closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA CRIMINAL PETITION No.8039 OF 2015
ORDER :
No representation for the petitioners-accused Nos.1 to 3.
Learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of
Telangana would represent that on charge sheet being filed, the learned XII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Nampally, has taken cognizance in C.C.No.112 of 2016, and, therefore, the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of the aforesaid submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, the criminal petition is dismissed as infructuous at admission stage.
Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this petition, shall stand closed.
__________________________ A. SHANKAR NARAYANA, J
17th February 2017.
mar
Petitioner-Accused Nos.1 to 3
State of Telangana
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
