Partly allowed

Dontha Suvarna v. The State of Telangana

Telangana HC1 Mar 2017CRLP/1522/2017

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Petition No. 1522 of 2017, the High Court of Hyderabad granted anticipatory bail to the female petitioner (A-1) but refused it to her husband (A-2). The court directed A-1 to surrender by 07/03/2017 on a personal bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties, while dismissing the petition concerning A-2.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail granted to petitioner A-1 (surrender by 07/03/2017 on Rs. 10,000 bond); bail refused to petitioner A-2. Petition partly allowed.

Dontha Suvarna Vs The State of Telangana — Cheating and Forgery | Telangana HC (2017)

¶1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

[Special Original Jurisdiction]

¶3

WEDNESDAY THE FIRST DAY OF MARCH, 2017

¶4

PRESENT HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶5

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2017

¶6

Between:

¶7

Dontha Survarna & Another … Petitioners/A-1 & A-2

¶8

V/s. The State of Telangana Represented by the Public Prosecutor High Court of Judicature for the State of Telangana & Andhra Pradesh, Through Station House Officer, Nakrekal Police Station, Nalgonda district. … Respondent/complainant

¶9

Counsel for the Petitioners: Sri G. Datheswar

¶10

Counsel for the Respondents: Additional Public Prosecutor [TG]

¶11

The court made the following: [order follows]

¶12

¶13

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶14

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2017

¶15

O R D E R :

¶16

The petitioners/A-1 and A-2 seeking anticipatory bail in Crime

¶17

No.301 of 2016 on the file of Nakrekal Police Station, Nalgonda district,

¶18

wherein they were charged for the offences punishable under section 417,

¶19

418, 420, 423, 506, 120-B of IPC.

¶20

Heard.

¶21

Learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that apart

¶22

from the present offences, similar offences were charged against A-2, who

¶23

is the husband of A-1 in Crime No. 19 of 2017 and Crime No. 15 of 2014

¶24

of Nakrekal Police Station and in that view, he would argue that the

¶25

petition may be dismissed.

¶26

Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the first

¶27

petitioner is a lady and the second petitioner is her husband and they

¶28

have not committed any offence and they were falsely implicated in this

¶29

case.

¶30

Having regard to the fact that crimes were registered against the

¶31

second petitioner/A-2, anticipatory bail is refused to the second

¶32

¶33

petitioner/A-2. However, considering the fact that the first petitioner/A-1

¶34

is a lady, she is not involved in other related offence, anticipatory bail is

¶35

granted in her favour.

¶36

Accordingly, the petition is partly allowed and the first

¶37

petitioner/A-1 is directed to surrender before the Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nakrekal, Nalgonda district, on or before 07/03/2017 and on

¶38

such surrender she shall be enlarged on bail on her executing a personal

¶39

bond for Rs.10,000/- with two sureties for the like sum each to the

¶40

satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate of First Class, Nakrekal. The first petitioner/A-1 is directed to appear before the Station House Officer, Nakrekal Police Station, Nalgonda district, on every Monday between 10:00 a.m. and 12:00 noon till charge sheet is filed. The bail application is

¶41

dismissed in so far as petitioner No.2/A-2 is concerned.

¶42

As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions if any, pending in this

¶43

Criminal Petition shall stand closed.

¶44

______________________________________ JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶45

01/03/2017 I s L

¶46

¶47

HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE U. DURGA PRASAD RAO

¶48

CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 1522 OF 2017

¶49

Date: 01/03/2017 Circulation No. Court Master: I s L

Dontha Suvarna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dontha Suvarna v. The State of Telangana

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Tadikamalla Srinivasa Harsha Nandah.(A-8) Vs State of Ap

Yagani Manoj Kumar, Vs Yagani Sravanthi

Assu , Mohd Ashraf Ali ,a Ashraf Ali Vs The State of Telangana

Chowdavarapu Jagadish Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Alapati Ramesh Vs Mattaparthi Nagamani

Alapati Ramesh Vs Garapati Sarala