The Commissioner of Customs v. M/s Lanco Industries Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE…
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
AND HON’ BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
CEA No.76 of 2016
JUDGMENT: ( per Hon’ble Sri Just ice V. Ramasubramanian )
In view of the letter dated 23.01.2017 addressed by the learned senior standing counsel for the petitioner to the Registry, stating that the value of the duty involved in this appeal is less than the ceiling limit, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, in this writ petition shall
stand closed.
_________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J
J. UMA DEVI, J
Date: 07.02.2017
BSS
2
HON’ BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’ BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
69
CEA No.76 of 2016
( per Hon’ble Sri Just ice V. Ramasubramanian)
BSS
Date: 07.02.2017
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court