Commissioner of Central Excise, v. M/S Pennar Industries Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Central Excise Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn per an application filed in C.E.A.M.P. No.68 of 2017.
The Central Excise Appeal was dismissed as withdrawn per an application filed in C.E.A.M.P. No.68 of 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL No.38 of 2005
JUDGMENT: (Per VRS,J)
In the light of the prayer made in C.E.A.M.P.No.68 of 2017 for withdrawal of the present appeal, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions if any pending in the
appeal shall stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.
__________________________ V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J ______________ J. UMA DEVI, J. 14th March, 2017 cbs
2
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND
THE HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE J. UMA DEVI
C.E.A.No. 38 of 2005
(withdrawn)
14th March, 2017
cbs
V. RAMASUBRAMANIAN
J. UMA DEVI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court