Central Excise Appeal No. 161 of 2010 was disposed of by dismissal due to withdrawal, as the duty value was below the statutory ceiling. The order specifically left the questions of law unanswered and closed any pending miscellaneous petitions.
Appeal dismissed as withdrawn; questions of law remained unanswered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
Central Excise Appeal No.161 of 2010
Judgment:
The value of the duty involved is less than the ceiling limit as stipulated in Circular Letter F.No.390/Misc/163/ 2010-JC, dated 17-12-2015. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. However, the questions of law are left unanswered. The miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending
in this appeal shall stand closed. No costs.
___________
V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN, J.
J.UMA DEVI, J.
13 th March, 2017.
Ak
2
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE V.RAMASUBRAMANIAN AND HON’BLE Ms JUSTICE J.UMA DEVI
Central Excise Appeal No.161 of 2010
13th March, 2017. (Ak)
V. Ramasubramanian
J. Uma Devi
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
