Writ petition by a GPA holder seeking direction not to entertain registration of documents by third parties over his office for specific land was dismissed as no document was presented and Rule 58 prohibits entertaining complaints before presentation.
The writ petition was dismissed with no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO
WRIT PETITION NO.28135 OF 2017
ORDER:
2
limited scope of enquiry is provided and Rule 58 of the Rules clearly prohibits entertaining any complaint/objection against registration of a document except considering the objections on five items mentioned therein. Even the provision of Rule 58 of the Rules may be attracted only when an objection is made at the time when some person presents a document for registration and processed by the registering authority.
3
____________________ (P.NAVEEN RAO, J)
23rd August 2017 RRB
3 issues framed by the court
Whether a writ petition can be maintained seeking a direction not to register a document before it is presented with objection under Rule 58.
Whether the General Power of Attorney holder has standing to represent the owners in preventing presentation of a document by third parties.
Whether the Sub Registrar is justified in entertaining a document for registration despite an objection filed by the petitioner before presentation.
Petitioner
Third Respondent
P.NAVEEN RAO
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
