A single-judge court observed that the appeals were compromised and that deed of confirmation was fully complied with, holding appeals closed.
Compromise deemed fully complied with; appeals closed; orders for costs not passed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU AS Nos.2697 of 2001 and 660 of 2002
COMMON JUDGMENT:
On 01.11.2017, it was represented by the learned counsel for the respondents that the matters were compromised between the parties. Learned counsel for the appellants seeks time to get instructions from his clients about the compromise.
Sri Rajasekhar, learned counsel representing
Sri P.V.R.Sharma, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that he addressed registered letters to the appellants to the addresses mentioned in the Court proceedings, but the covers were returned un-served, and he has nothing to submit in the matter.
Learned counsel for the respondents submits that deed of confirmation and compromise has been fully complied with.
Nothing else remains to be done regarding the said compromise, and in view of the facts stated by the learned counsel for the parties, the appeals are closed.
Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in these appeals shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
________________________ D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU,J
Dt:10.11.2017
kdl
D.V.S.S.SOMAYAJULU
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
