K. Siddaiah, S/o. Chengaiah, Vs State of a.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue

¶1

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

¶2

W.P.No.904 OF 2016

¶3

ORDER:

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Government Pleader for Revenue.

¶5

Aggrieved by the order of seizure of petitioners’ bore-well, under the WALTA Act passed by the Sub Collector, Madanapalle in ROC.C2/2781/2015, dated 21.11.2015, the petitioners stated to have filed appeal before the 2^nd respondent-District Collector on 19.12.2015, which is now pending before the Joint Collector, Chittoor District. The order of seizure of bore-well now questioned in this writ petition.

¶6

Though, learned counsel for the petitioners state that an appeal is filed along with the stay petition, the record only shows the filing of appeal. Since the remedy of appeal is availed by the petitioners, I am not inclined to entertain the writ petition and it is appropriate to permit the petitioners to seek appropriate interim relief by making an application in the pending appeal, provided no such application is already filed. The 2^nd respondent is directed to fix an early date for hearing of the appeal and interim application and at least hear and pass appropriate orders on the interim application of the petitioners preferably within a period of one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

¶7

Therefore, with liberty to the petitioners to avail remedy so available under the WALTA Act, the writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

¶8

Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the writ petition shall stand closed.

¶9

____________________________ VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR, J

¶10

07.01.2016 kvrm

¶11

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V.AFZULPURKAR

¶12

W.P.No.904 OF 2016

¶13

DATE: 07.01.2016

¶14

kvrm

K. Siddaiah, S/o. Chengaiah, v. State of a.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

K. Siddaiah, S/o. Chengaiah, v. State of a.P., rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

G.Sreedhar W.G.Dist and 7 Others Vs Secy Rev Dept Hyd and 26 Others

Chinavath Sali Vs The State of Telangana

Pilli Najaneyulu Yadav R.R.Dist Vs Prl Secy Rev Dept Hyd and 2 Others

Gumma Kondamma, W/o.Pedda Markaiah, Vs The State of Andhra Pradesh

Begari Danaiah S/o. Late Surpaiah Vs The State of Telangana

S.Kondalaiah, Vs State of Telangana