This order allows the petitioner's application to withdraw the underlying writ petition. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission accorded to withdraw the writ petition; writ petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA & THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WRIT PETITION No.13466 of 2015
&
WPMP.No.54976 of 2015
BETWEEN
S. Kondaiah.
... PETITIONER
AND
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue, Hyderabad and others.
...RESPONDENTS
DATE OF JUDGMENT PRONOUNCED: 07.01.2016
THE HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
1. Whether Reporters of Local newspapers No may be allowed to see the Judgments?
2. Whether the copies of judgment may be No marked to Law Reporters/Journals?
3. Whether Their Ladyship/Lordship wish to No see the fair copy of the Judgment?
ORDER:
WPMP.No.54976 of 2015:
This petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition
2. Permission is accorded.
WPMP is ordered.
WP.No.13466 of 2015:
In view of the above, the writ petition is accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. As a sequel, the miscellaneous applications, if any, shall stand closed. There shall be no order as to costs.
______________________ VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR, J
January 7, 2016 DSK
S. Kondaiah.
State of Telangana, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue, Hyderabad
VILAS V. AFZULPURKAR
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
