Writ petition dismissed for default due to non-appearance of the petitioner on the hearing dates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.6010 OF 2001
ORDER:
On 21.01.2016, when the matter was taken up for hearing, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “For dismissal”. Even today, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Hence, the Writ Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
2. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
_________________________________________ JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
Date: 22.01.2016 AMD
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE M.SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.6010 OF 2001
DATE: 22.01.2016
AMD
Petitioner
Respondent
M. Satyanarayana Murthy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
