P.Subhash Babu Hyd v. D.M. Apsrtc Hydandanr
Case brief
What is this about?
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence at the hearing listed for dismissal, without imposing costs.
The writ petition was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the petitioner's absence at the hearing listed for dismissal, without imposing costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
WRIT PETITION No.16233 OF 2001
ORDER:
Despite the matter listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, none appeared for the petitioner.
Hence, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution, but without costs.
Consequently, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed.
___________________________________ M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY, J
Dt.22.01.2016 BV
M. SATYANARAYANA MURTHY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court