Dismissed

Sri B.Viswanatham, v. The Commissioner of Prohibition of Excise

Telangana HC12 Apr 2016WP/5367/2008

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

On April 12, 2016, the High Court of Judicature at Hyderabad, bench of ACJ Dilip B. Bhosale and Justice P. Naveen Rao, dismissed multiple writ petitions. The court followed a Full Bench reference answer dated June 26, 2015, upholding the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, A.P. vs. Sharma Goud.

What did the court decide?

All writ petitions are dismissed. Pending miscellaneous applications stand closed. No order as to costs.

Sri B.Viswanatham, Vs The Commissione… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Telangana HC (2016)

¶1

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

¶2

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶3

WRIT PETITION Nos. 24392, 31451, 32154 and 34431 of 1997; 4992, 11887, 12626, 13105 and 33387 of 2008; 26031 of 1999; 157, 5214, 12983, 20296 of 2000; 3914, 15545, 19471 and 22266 of 2001; 916, 4954, 8671, 8677, 14483, 15276, 15377, 20378, 22948, 24132, 24776 and 24779 of 2002; 101, 14756, 16948, 24166 and 27067 of 2003; 8157, 8541, 8977, 13875 and 18574 of 2004; 10099 and 26905 of 2006; 15282, 15931, 18073, 19665 and 22120 of 2007; 2502, 4851, 5367, 5405, 6014, 6115 and 9482 of 2008

¶4

Date: 12.04.2016

¶5

W.P.No.24392 of 1997 Between:

¶6

ABT Limited, rep., by its Senior Manager, Tamilnadu.

¶7

… Petitioner

¶8

And

¶9

The Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise, A.P., Hyderabad & another.

¶10

… Respondents

¶11

This Court made the following:

¶12

HON’BLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE DILIP B. BHOSALE AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P. NAVEEN RAO

¶13

¶14

PC: (per the Hon’ble The Acting Chief Justice Dilip B. Bhosale)

¶15

Learned counsel for the petitioners, in all fairness, state that these writ petitions deserve to be dismissed in view of the reference answered by the Full Bench, dated 26.06.2015, in Writ Petition No.20296 of 2000 and batch, following the decision of the Supreme Court in Commissioner, Prohibition and Excise, A.P. and another vs. Sharma Goud a^[1] .

¶16

In the circumstances, all the writ petitions are dismissed following the judgment of the Full Bench, dated 26.06.2015, passed in the aforementioned batch of writ petitions.

¶17

Consequently, pending miscellaneous applications, shall also stand closed. There shall no order as to costs.

¶18

________________________ DILIP. B. BHOSALE, ACJ

¶19

________________________ P. NAVEEN RAO, J

¶20

Date: 12.04.2016 ES

¶21

[1] (2007) 6 SCC 42

Sri B.Viswanatham, v. The Commissioner of Prohibition of Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sri B.Viswanatham, v. The Commissioner of Prohibition of Excise

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Munigela Narsingh Vs The Government of Andhra Pradesh, rep.by its Principal

Prof. P.Chenna Reddy, Vs The State of Telangana

Poludasu Vemana Vs Municipal Commissioner

V. Shankar S/o Pool Singh, Vs The Deputy Commissioner of Proh and Excise

B.Rawoof Khan, Vs Andhra Pradesh State Wakf Board

Smt. Hazrat Bee (died) Vs Commissioner of Prohibition and Excise