The court allowed a writ petition challenging the non-renewal of a notary certificate at the admission stage. The petition was disposed of by following an earlier order (W.P.No.9655/2016) without independent detailed reasoning.
Writ petition allowed; pending miscellaneous petitions closed; no order as to costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.45682 OF 2016
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the consent of both the parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
Note: Registry is directed to attach copy of the order, dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.No.9655/2016 and Batch to this order. dv
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
27-12-2016
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the petitioner's writ petition seeking declaration of illegality regarding non-renewal of notary certificate should be allowed by relying on a prior order in W.P.No.9655 of 2016.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.9655 of 2016 and BatchFollowed¶5
Petitioner
Respondents 2 to 4
Rajasheker Reddy
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
