In this writ petition challenging the non-renewal of a notary certificate, the Court disposed of the matter at the admission stage by allowing it, following a prior order in a related batch. No order as to costs was passed.
Writ petition allowed. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions to be closed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.RAJASHEKER REDDY WRIT PETITION No.45515 OF 2016
ORDER:
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Government Pleader for Revenue. With the consent of both the parties, the Writ Petition is disposed of at the admission stage itself.
Note: Registry is directed to attach copy of the order, dated 02.12.2016 in W.P.No.9655/2016 and Batch to this order. dv
_________________________ A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
27-12-2016
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY,J
27-12-2016 dv
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the action of respondents in not renewing the petitioner's notary certificate is illegal and arbitrary.
Whether the writ petition is disposed of allowing release in light of a prior order in a batch.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
W.P.No.9655 of 2016Followed¶4
Petitioner
Respondents 2 to 4
A.RAJASHEKER REDDY
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
