M.Vindhya Sri, W/o Sridhar, v. The Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A .…
R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A .…
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.42013 of 2015
ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
Sri Chandrasekhar, counsel representing Sri Nageshwar Rao Pujari, learned counsel for the petitioner, seeks permission of this Court to withdraw the writ petition.
2. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn, at the admission stage. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
________________________________ JUSTICE A. SHANKAR
NARAYANA 04.01.2016. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.42013 of 2015
04.01.2016 Msr
Nageshwar Rao Pujari
R. SUBHASH REDDY
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court