Petitioner challenged the Bank's auction under SARFAESI Act for non-compliance of interim deposit conditions. Court dismissed the writ petition at admission stage, holding petitioner cannot get relief in this petition after auction and sale certificate issued.
Petitioner directed to implead auction purchaser if aggrieved by sale; writ petition dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.37115 of 2015
ORDER : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R.Subhash Reddy)
This writ petition is filed by the petitioner seeking Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent-Bank in initiating proceedings under the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for brevity “the SARFAESI Act”) for auctioning the mortgaged properties of the petitioner for a lesser value, as arbitrary and illegal.
2. While issuing notice before admission, this Court, by order dated 16.11.2015, granted interim stay on condition of the petitioner depositing a sum of Rs.25,00,000/- on or before 20.11.2015 and a further sum of Rs.25,00,000/- within a period of four weeks from the date of the said order, with a further direction to the respondent-Bank to defer the auction to be held on 21.11.2015, on payment of Rs.25,00,000/- on or before 20.11.2015.
3. During the course of hearing, it is brought to the notice of this Court that as the petitioner has not deposited any amount, as directed above, auction was conducted on 21.11.2015 and Sale Certificate was also issued to the third party-auction purchaser.
4. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.
5. The auction purchaser is not made a party-respondent to the writ petition. If the auction is already conducted on
21.11.2015 and the petitioner is aggrieved by such auction, it is open for the petitioner to question such auction sale by impleading the third party-auction purchaser, who was issued the Sale Certificate, but no direction can be issued in this writ petition.
6. Subject to the above observation, this writ petition is dismissed, at the admission stage. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. No order as to costs.
____________________________ JUSTICE R. SUBHASH REDDY
________________________________ JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA 23.12.2015. Msr
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R.SUBHASH REDDY AND HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A.SHANKAR NARAYANA
WRIT PETITION No.37115 of 2015
23.12.2015 Msr
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant directions to quash the auction conducted by the Bank under the SARFAESI Act.
Petitioner
Respondent-Bank
R. SUBHASH REDDY
A. SHANKAR NARAYANA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
